Violon d’Ingres + The Void. 100 cm x 85 cm . Oil on Canvas. 2018
In this painting I wanted to revisit the crouching figure from ’ The Woman' which I found so viscerally powerful.
The view of a figure from behind is psychologically significant; this is not the usual interaction between model and viewer, instead the figure appears unaware of observation, the viewer acts either as voyeur on a private moment, or may enter the frame with the figure acting as avatar, seeing what she ‘sees’, accepting her viewpoint as our own.
 Ingres, Jean Auguste Dominique, The Valpinçon Bather. 1808. Louvre, Paris. www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/bather-known-valpincon-bather | In ‘The Woman’, the head is hidden, bowed down into the body, introspective and private. By raising the head, the figure becomes charged with intention, prepared to move forward.  The Woman. 100 cm x 85 cm . Oil on Canvas. 2016 |
One of my strongest early influences as a painter was Jean Dominique Ingres. His mastery in representing the look of skin that appears warm and alive captivated me as a young painter. Now, as a mature artist, I am able to also appreciate his ability to render the human form as a monumental, universal symbol.
| In this painting I pay homage to Ingres’ masterpiece, The Valpinçon Bather, (as well as referencing Man Ray’s homage photo ‘Le Violon d’Ingres’), and Anish Kapoor’s contemporary sculpture ‘The Void’, which I see as a descendant of the monumental form in space in a lineage leading directly from Ingres to Henry Moore to Anish Kapoor. |  IRay, Man, Le violin d’Ingres. 1924. The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA. http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/objects/54733/man-ray-le-violon-d'ingres-ingres's-violin-american-1924/ |
 Kapoor, Anish, The Void. 1989. http://anishkapoor.com/67/void |  Kapoor, Anish, The Void. 1989. http://anishkapoor.com/67/void |
In a Lucian Freud exhibition in Paris in 2010, I saw a quotation from Freud, something to the effect that he had striven as a young artist to be original, but as he matured, he realized that art is always reactionary. We look at art, and imitate what we like, incorporating elements of other artist’s ideas and imagery, or we make a counter argument to work that we deem to be flawed.
RSS Feed
